![fetus heart pro life fetus heart pro life](https://www.lifenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/heroicmedia3.png)
But the most common pro-choice responses to the pro-life argument don't do this. To defend abortion rights requires refuting such arguments. Pro-life "ethics education" involves training people to advocate for this type of argument. If asked why abortion should be illegal, they will often reply with an argument like this:įetuses are innocent human beings with the right to life, and-since it's always wrong to kill innocent human beings-abortion is murder and should be illegal, with few exceptions.Īdvocates of this type of argument include the Catholic Church, evangelical Christians, and organizations like the National Right to Life and Americans United for Life. Their primary motivations are, from their perspective, ethical or moral. Think about what motivates people who want to make abortion illegal. Given the stakes here, it's time for pro-choice advocates and organizations to rethink the wisdom of avoiding talk of ethics. Surely they view this " ethics education" as a wise and effective investment, since it has helped bring abortion rights to the legally precarious place they are now. Meanwhile, over that same time period and up to the present, pro-life advocates have seen engaging the ethics of abortion as essential to their cause and have invested heavily into training sessions, educational institutes, and materials to help move their message. Representatives of pro-choice organizations sometimes claim they are " doing all they can" to protect abortion rights, but this is not true: Mary Ziegler recently reported in The Atlantic that, since the 1990s, pro-choice advocates have deliberately avoided engaging moral or ethical questions about abortion they have focused solely on the legal freedom to choose abortion. While legal attacks demand immediate legal responses, these responses aren't a long-term, comprehensive strategy to protect legal rights and access to abortion. If the issue comes before them, it is unclear how they might rule: they have already restricted a medication used to induce abortions and might welcome further restrictions. The Supreme Court now has a majority of justices who identify as "pro-life," and will surely be more receptive to these attacks on abortion rights than previous courts have been.
![fetus heart pro life fetus heart pro life](https://post.healthline.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/fetal-echocardiography_thumb.jpg)
Arkansas and South Carolina are the most recent states to pass laws to ban abortion after 6 weeks into pregnancy, when a "heartbeat" can be detected in the fetus and before many women even know they are pregnant.
![fetus heart pro life fetus heart pro life](http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-ol-vE5tGAeQ/Ut-35Vw9xZI/AAAAAAAAbrk/XIXo1BQgDhE/s1600/Pro-life+cartoon.jpg)
In recent years, over 250 abortion-restrictive laws have been proposed across 45 states. But ethics education can help - and defenders of abortion rights should recognize this, before it's too late.